Jun. 30, 2025
As more manufacturers embrace factory automation technologies, many are exploring the use of collaborative robots, or cobots, as they tend to be more budget friendly than traditional robots and are well suited to industrial applications such as material handling, assembly, inspection and packaging. However, before implementing a collaborative robot, it’s important to understand the differences between a cobot and an industrial robot and to examine both the advantages and disadvantages of this popular automation technology.
Goto Fuxin Intelligent to know more.
This means that unlike traditional robotic automation, cobots can safely operate around and collaborate with people without the need for safety barriers or isolated work cells.
As with traditional robots, the goal with collaborative robots is not to replace human operators, but rather to boost the throughput of industrial processes by efficiently automating repetitive tasks while allowing human workers to focus on operations that require more advanced cognitive thought and/or greater dexterity.
Finally, collaborative robots tend to be more adaptable and easier to reprogram than traditional robotic automation technologies, giving them more flexibility around the facility than standard industrial robots, which are typically employed for one purpose over their lifetime in the factory.
Because cobots offer capabilities that can be used in almost every manufacturing setting, additional investments for safety barriers isn’t required in many applications. They are also flexible enough to be introduced to different areas within the same organization and are often lower in price than traditional robots, manufacturers often select cobots over traditional robots, especially when they are just beginning to adopt automation. While this is a good strategy, it’s crucial to consider the benefits, as well as the shortcomings, associated with collaborative robots before committing to a cobot. Below we highlight the top three advantages and disadvantages of these manufacturing marvels.
The rise of cobots and increasingly intelligent robots has created a new dilemma for organizations seeking to join Industry 4.0.
This article offers a deeper understanding of the differences between a cobot palletizer and a robot palletizer, presenting the advantages and disadvantages of both solutions, so you can make well-informed choices before deciding on a cobot or a robot for your specific needs.
First things first, what defines a cobot and what defines a robot? Let’s dive deeper into each of them.
The expression “Cobot” is short for collaborative robot, referring to a robot designed to work in collaboration with humans.
The cobot is required to operate within certain parameters to be permitted to work in the same area as humans: maximum speed, safety measures, and human supervision. This means that a cobot is limited to operations where the speed of the conveyor or production does not exceed the speed of the cobot. They are well-suited for tasks where humans work closely or even alongside the conveyor, such as pick and place, polishing, grinding, and machine tending tasks.
Some advantages of a cobot are the short installation time, easy interface, and flexibility. A complete cobot palletizing solution can be installed in a matter of weeks, encompassing everything from validation and fabrication to installation.
This case story is an example of how quickly it can be done.
In addition to the short installation time, the cobots provide a more straightforward interface that requires minimal training to use and program.
Software like Rocketfarm’s Pally makes it easy to modify and adjust your cobot. Compared to an industrial robot, a cobot is often much smaller in size, can be installed in various places, can perform multiple tasks, and does not necessarily require fencing or major area adjustments to ensure safety. Combined with easy programming makes the cobot a lot more flexible than an industrial robot.
A robot is not bound by the same parameters as a cobot, such as speed limitations, because it usually requires a cage. Automation with a robot requires a “fixed workcell” to operate safely, which necessitates a more comprehensive installation process and increased space requirements. On the other hand, the industrial robot is a more capable piece of machinery in terms of payload and speed.
For high-volume production and fast conveyors, a robot is better suited than a cobot, as it can operate at a higher pace. Another benefit of an industrial robot is that, once installed with fencing and safety measures, it does not require human supervision. Lastly, reach should also be considered an advantage for robots as they can palletize higher and need less programming to adjust for reach issues.
The cost of a robot or cobot varies significantly depending on the type of solution that works best for you.
If you are looking for more details, kindly visit collaborative robot palletizer.
Sometimes, a “turn-key” solution is what you will need, and sometimes customization is necessary. A turn-key solution for a cobot palletizer costs from €70,000, depending on the type of robot, gripper, software, and other components you choose. A turn-key robot palletizer can cost anywhere from €100,000 to €200,000, and this price may not include fencing and other installation requirements.
Palletizing is one of the many areas of application for robots and cobots, and in short, it involves placing products on a pallet for shipment or storage. It used to be, and still is for many small and medium-sized enterprises, a task performed by human labor.
It is a very repetitive and labor-intensive task that robots and cobots are gradually taking over, and this trend has led to a wide range of palletizers to choose from.
A cobot can go straight to work in the production area without significant changes to the production line and facilities. As stated above, the cobot palletizer must operate within certain parameters. For many enterprises, these are the deciding factors when choosing between a cobot and a robot:
These are all variables that need to be considered when going for a palletizing solution. For many small to medium-sized enterprises, a cobot is more than capable of handling all the issues above. Cobot palletizers are compared to robot palletizers as being easier to deploy, having a shorter installation time, and being easier to program. Flexibility is key.
The robot palletizer has been around for decades and has proven its worth by efficiently processing large quantities and handling heavy products. This type of robot requires a fixed workcell and cannot operate alongside humans, as it performs operations at a higher speed and with greater weight. However, for larger organizations, a fully automated system with reduced human interaction may be beneficial.
The table below compares an industrial robot from Kuka and a collaborative robot from Universal Robots:
As shown in the table above, cobots and robots share many similarities. But at the same time, they’re not, because they’ve got their own individual strengths. These key factors should be considered when selecting a palletizer:
As stated above, there may be a significant price difference between robots and cobots. An industrial robot requires a higher initial investment. It requires additional resources, such as floor space, and the organization must be financially capable of sustaining a more extended return on investment (ROI).
A cobot has a lower upfront investment than a robot, does not require the same amount of floor space, and has a shorter ROI due to lower costs.
In addition to upfront costs, there are maintenance and electrical expenses; the maintenance expenses vary significantly depending on the type of equipment used, and the electrical costs vary according to the size of the robot. Lastly, a cobot is significantly easier and less expensive to reprogram or modify for different tasks than an industrial robot.
The requirements for safety is a big part of the reason why industrial robots need more floor space, they need heavy fencing and sometimes extra sensors. A cobot is typically installed without fencing and extra sensors, allowing for installation with limited floor space.
The payload is one of the key strengths of an industrial robot. As stated above, the Kuka robot can lift up to kg. When comparing this to the UR30 from Universal Robots, which has a maximum payload of 35 kg, the difference is significant.
This is where the cobot shines, as it can be installed in only one day. An industrial robot, on the other hand, has a significantly higher installation time, taking up to several months.
Read article: Short installation time and no downtime were a massive advantage for Aegir Brewery when they chose a cobot palletizer
For more information, please visit industrial palletizing robot.
Previous: Maximizing Efficiency with Collaborative Robot Palletizers
Next: High Speed Robotic Palletizer Trends and Innovations for 2025
If you are interested in sending in a Guest Blogger Submission,welcome to write for us!
All Comments ( 0 )